• AnnisEditorial Services
  • Anniseed’s Attic
  • About Me
  • Policies

The Tangled Leaves of Anniseed

The Tangled Leaves of Anniseed

Tag Archives: Politics

The Story of Baby P: Setting the Record Straight by Ray Jones

28 Tuesday Oct 2014

Posted by Anniseed in Book Review

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

Child protection, Media, Politics, Social work, Society

I recently read this whilst on holiday – not exactly a relaxing vacation read, but I found myself with a burning desire to understand just what had happened in this appalling case. Last night a documentary, Baby P: The Untold Story, was aired on the BBC based on this book, so I thought I’d post my thoughts.

A lot of people I’ve spoken to were wary of watching the documentary and reluctant to read the book, fearful of facing horrific accounts of abuse, but in fact neither book or documentary dwelt too much on the abuse of Peter Connolly by his mother, her boyfriend and his brother, but on the media frenzy that followed, so although it is not comfortable reading it is not gratuitous.

Ray Jones presents a chilling analysis of what happened in the aftermath of this poor boy’s murder. The Sun newspaper, under the direction of Rebekah Brooks, launched a campaign ostensibly to prevent such a tragedy from ever happening again, but in reality the campaign was a witch-hunt, hounding the individual social workers involved with the Connolly family. It was unprecedented in its vitriol, inciting the nation to express not only disgust and rage but to form a virtual lynch mob, blaming the social workers, and the Director of Social Services Sharon Shoesmith, for Peter’s death rather than the actual perpetrators of the crime. Jones charts the progress of the campaign, how it misrepresented events, gave inaccurate information and repeatedly sought spurious connections with other incidents to keep the story in the public eye. The campaign forced Ed Balls to take decisive action and he fired Shoesmith live on television. But this was still not enough for The Sun, who relentlessly pursued her. Yet Shoesmith later went on to win her claim against her sacking and the Courts decided that she had been scapegoated.

Jones carefully picks out the other players in the drama. Social Services, stretched to breaking point, had made some errors in dealing with the case but there were other services that had made more grave errors – and yet these were effectively airbrushed out of the picture. Social Services twice reported suspicions of abuse to the police – who twice failed to investigate. The GP who examined Peter did not report any concerns despite repeated presentation of injuries. And the Great Ormond Street doctor, who infamously “failed to spot” Peter’s broken back (which may actually have occurred after his visit to the hospital), was an insufficiently trained locum who had no support and arguably should not have been appointed. (The tragic outcome for this doctor, detailed in the documentary, was very distressing.) So the blame should have been shared out more honestly. (It’s important to note that without evidence from health services and the police, Social Services cannot remove a child from its parents – a court would not allow it.)

But then came the investigation. And here Ofsted shows its colours. Despite having given Haringey a good inspection report shortly after Peter’s death, they redacted this report and produced a new one, rating Haringey as inadequate. Jones charts the progress of each draft of this report and how it was altered to suit a specific agenda. Likewise the recommendations of the first Joint Area Review, which initially laid the blame on all services involved, was repeatedly redrafted until it focused only on the social workers and let everyone else off the hook. So Ofsted, the police, Great Ormond Street and the GP’s surgery all fade into the background with sighs of relief.

And so we were all lied to. “A boy died because social workers did not do their job.” Why the lies?

It’s hard to read the book without becoming aware of the role of the politicians and the press, again which Jones dissects thoroughly. Call me paranoid but I spot an agenda. The Sun, led by Rebekah Brooks, had led other campaigns focused on the death / abuse / disappearance of children, all of which were suspect in their motivation to some extent. David Cameron, then in opposition, was very closely linked to Brooks and supported her campaign, attacking Ed Balls in the House of Commons (interestingly, getting his details of the case wrong). The message both are keen to promulgate is that Social Services, which are led by local councils, aren’t doing their jobs properly. Our children aren’t safe in the hands of social workers. When we are now in the situation that the Tory government, headed by Cameron, wants to dismantle public services and local councils, and privatise everything – including child protection – we see the connections more clearly. There is money to made out of misery. They can make us pay. This discourse of public service incompetence and failure serves to prepare us for a “better option” – private, profit-making companies like G4 and Serco can succeed where social workers can’t.

I couldn’t help feeling, as I read this book, that Cameron’s been playing the long game. Did he see an opportunity to use a child’s murder to gain political points and to bolster his agenda to dismantle public services? This book makes me think it’s possible. Oddly, the pernicious role of the media and the politicians were slightly skirted over in the otherwise excellent documentary, with one ITV journalist laying the blame on public anger for the longevity of the story (but that anger was clearly incited, stoked and manipulated by the tabloid press).

The key point is that neither Cameron’s policies or The Sun’s campaign has made children safer. It’s actually had the opposite effect.

It was never about child protection.

Sadly, Peter’s story is not an unusual one. A child dies at the hand of a parent every ten days in the UK. Children in every city, town and village are being abused. Social workers do an incredibly difficult job trying to protect them but it will take us all as a society to make a difference. The scapegoating of social workers is a travesty of justice, and this whole case brings shame on us all.

The Story of Baby P: Setting the Record Straight is an excellent, thought-provoking book that will enrage you. I thought I was unshockable, but I was wrong. My one criticism is that structurally it is a little repetitive, so some passages are hard to get through, and it could have done with a stronger edit. But in terms of the message, it’s hard to deny its power. Read it, and watch the documentary, because the lies need to be exposed – for the sake of Peter, and every child.

Policy Press, 2014, ISBN 9781447316220

 

Letter to the Mercury

17 Friday Oct 2014

Posted by Anniseed in Campaigning

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Campaigning, Politics, Public libraries

The Leicester Mercury have posted my email to the members of the Council’s Scrutiny Committee on their website, which I thought I’d also share here:

Re: The Scrutiny meeting on proposals for the library service, 15th October

I am very concerned that the remit of this meeting was to discuss the 16 libraries remaining open and how to manage the handing over of the remainder to communities.

My understanding of a consultation is that it seeks ideas and feedback and incorporates these into policies and plans.

This has not been the case with the consultation on libraries – and the agenda of this scrutiny meeting suggests that the consultation has indeed always been a “done deal”.

The consultation presented communities with inaccurate statistical data reflecting the use of libraries – the evidence was fundamentally flawed.

The consultation presented only one option – for communities to take over the running of libraries, or face losing them – which is blackmail. There are no true choices being presented here – this was no consultation.

The consultation, supposedly based on an earlier survey about which services should bear the brunt of cuts, told communities at the public meetings that libraries were at the bottom of the pile – this was not true, as your own analysis of the survey results proved, with a significant number of people defending the vital importance of their library service.

And now the scrutiny committee is looking at the one proposal put forward by the Council – not the ideas suggested by the people.

Remember that the High Court ruled in favour of local campaigners in Lincolnshire, against the County Council.

Yet this is still the tip of the iceberg for all our public services are under threat.

And let’s not forget – the Council has £97 million in reserve, has made staff redundant then re-employed them, and the expenses of councillors are questionable.

There is an obligation to protect vulnerable people, which is why the Council is required to perform Equality Impact Assessments for every proposed cut. Yet every cut will hit the most vulnerable. What sleight of hand will the Council use to get these cuts through?

The structure of local government should be reviewed for efficiency, to reduce duplication; do we need district councils in their current form? We don’t need Mayors or dignitaries. We don’t need executives with chauffeur-driven Jaguars. We don’t need heads of department on pay comparable to the private sector. Our overhaul of services must include an overhaul of the political infrastructure. There is much money to be saved here.

Councillors have blamed the Government for these draconian cuts and this is true. But while the Government pursue their agenda to dismantle or privatise every public service, they are cleverly pitting the people against their own Councils. And while we fight for individual public services, we don’t see the whole picture, and we don’t apportion blame in the right place. If all our Councils were to stand up to Government, the people would support them. We are all concerned, frightened, in despair. We should all work together and act together to oppose all these cuts – in that way we can make a difference.

I appeal to the Council to be honest with the people of Leicestershire, and rather than try to enlist us to run essential services, to ask us to support the Council in standing up to central Government, to protect the needs of the many rather than the interests of the privileged few.

 

 

Navigate around The Tangled Leaves

  • AnnisEditorial Services
  • Anniseed’s Attic
  • About Me
  • Policies

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 242 other followers

Anniseed on Twitter

  • RT @whatSFSaid: We ALL have stories to tell! The British Library is calling for kids across the UK to #StepInsideYourStory & make books abo… 1 hour ago
  • Love this. twitter.com/EllaRob8363121… 2 days ago
  • RT @CassieKempSLS: Wondering how to celebrate #WorldBookDay this year? Why not join Victoria and I for a FREE family book quiz over on the… 3 days ago
  • RT @IndependentSage: The government has instructed all children to go back to school on the 8th March. Kids, how do you feel about this? #I… 5 days ago
  • RT @whatSFSaid: There would be no adult literature without children's literature. No books at all without children's books! They're the on… 6 days ago

The Tangled Leaves of Anniseed

Welcome to the world of Anniseed, bibliofiend and librarian, chaos gardener and allotmenteer, who sometimes finds caterpillars in her hair. This is my blog – what I’m reading and what I think about it, plus commentary on the world of books, and occasional rambles into the garden.

Search The Tangled Leaves of Anniseed

Previous Posts

All content ©Tangled Leaves of Anniseed. You can quote me for non-commercial purposes providing you cite your source (proper librarian-stuff there); if in doubt, or for any other use of my content, please e-mail me at jo@anniseed.com. (I’m quite generous towards people who ask nicely.)

Anniseed's Categories

Book News Book Review Campaigning Childrens Book Review Creative writing DVD Review Interview Musings Non-Fiction Publishing Uncategorized Young Adult Fiction Review

Anniseed’s Cloud

1970s Abuse Action Adolescence Adventure Angels Anniseed Apocalyptic Fiction Authors Biography Book trailer Campaigning Campaigns Childhood Children Christianity Classic television Conferences Creative writing Crime Detective Detectives Drugs DVD Dystopia E-readers Events Faery Families Fantasy Friendship Ghosts Graphic Novel Historical Horror Humour Libraries Literary Fiction Love Magic Monsters Murder Mystery Paganism Paranormal Paranormal Romance Politics Prisons Psychological Thriller Public libraries Publishers Publishing Reading Relationships Religion Research Romance Science Fiction Self-Publishing Serial Killers Short stories Supernatural Technology Thriller Tragedy True Crime TV Twenties Vampires Victorians Volunteers War Witchcraft Writing Young Adult Fiction

Anniseed

Anniseed

Anniseed

Bibliofiend, blogger and chaos gardener

View Full Profile →

Parajunkee Design
www.fictionfeedback.co.uk

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Cancel

 
Loading Comments...
Comment
    ×
    Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
    To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy